<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TransitBoston &#187; Government Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.transitboston.com/tag/government-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.transitboston.com</link>
	<description>Transit tidbits from Boston, Massachusetts, and vicinity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:00:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Grabauskas Retrospective; What Now for T?</title>
		<link>http://www.transitboston.com/2009/08/grabauskas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.transitboston.com/2009/08/grabauskas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Escalators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aloisi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automated Fare System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov. Patrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grabauskas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inefficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transitboston.com/?p=629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say what you will about Dan Grabauskas; he is a political survivor.  The public servant who reformed the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles resigned under pressure from Governor Patrick and his appointee James Aloisi today, nearly a year short of the end of his five-year term as general manager of the MBTA.  The Democratic governor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say what you will about Dan Grabauskas; he is a political survivor.  The public servant who reformed the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2009/08/patrick_asks_fo_1.html" target="_blank">resigned under pressure from Governor Patrick and his appointee James Aloisi today</a>, nearly a year short of the end of his five-year term as general manager of the MBTA.  The Democratic governor will have his chance to appoint a successor, but the bitter partisan flavor probably will linger with voters for some time.  The tab for buying Gov. Patrick an extra nine months of direct control of the MBTA: $327,487.  I hope that turns out to be a good investment, but at the moment it&#8217;s not so clear that Messrs. Patrick and Aloisi gave taxpayers a good deal.</p>
<p>In 2005, Grabauskas took the job of general manager with a clear vision.  The T would <a href="http://archive.southcoasttoday.com/daily/05-05/05-29-05/b04sr832.htm" target="_blank">treat riders like customers; the system would be reliable, clean, courteous, and safe</a>.  But mainly clean.  <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/05/06/grabauskas_pledges_improvements_at_mbta/" target="_blank">And accessible; inaccessibility &#8220;impacts not only on the disabled, but on parents with children in strollers, as well.&#8221;</a> Grabauskas professed to be a neatnik; he was particularly concerned about the condition of elevators and escalators.  He apparently believed that if he made the T a comfortable place to be, riders would flock and revenues would soar.  And, of course, he wanted to control costs.</p>
<p>So four years later, how did he do?</p>
<p>Grabauskas never shrunk from the gaze of his &#8220;customers,&#8221; for example writing a <a href="http://www.metro.us/us/article/2007/09/24/02/3106-72/index.xml" target="_blank">regular Q+A column in the free daily paper Metro</a>, and appearing more than once on WBUR public radio.  He was determined to keep riders <em>safe</em>;<em> </em>he initiated random, highly visible <a href="http://transitpolice.us/Press-News%20Releases%202006.htm" target="_blank">police screening checkpoints</a>.  He committed to spending hundreds of millions of dollars to make the T more accessible, installing announcement screens and elevated platforms on the Green Line.  He resisted union contract demands and agreed to wage increases only <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/10/10/mbta_parking_to_increase_2_a_day/" target="_blank">after being overruled by a labor arbitrator</a>.  The T renovated the Charles Street station and installed a new train control system on the Red Line that permitted more frequent service.  And there is the electronic fare system.</p>
<p>The list goes on.  Grabauskas was nothing if not engaged in the goings-on at the T.  Perhaps one can disagree with him on policy matters &#8212; for example it might be reasonable to question the wisdom of a having a broke organization with heavy capital needs spend hundreds of millions of dollars in an effort to meet the unique requirements of less than 0.1% of T riders &#8212; but the man demonstrated integrity and dedication to his &#8220;customers.&#8221;</p>
<p>But many things never changed.  Yes, <a href="http://www.universalhub.com/node/26808" target="_blank">the trains still are slow and late</a>.  Yes, the <a href="http://www.transitboston.com/resources/elevator-escalator-project/" target="_blank">escalators have at times been scandalously unreliable</a>.  Yes there still are <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/06/14/t_may_try_again_to_cut_secondary_train_operators/?rss_id=Boston.com+--+Local+news" target="_blank">door-openers on the  Red, Green, and Orange Lines</a>.  Yes, <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/08/13/can_more_go_wrong/" target="_blank">Kenmore Station still is under construction</a> nearly five years later.  No, Dan Grabauskas <a href="http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/dontquoteme/archive/2008/07/10/herald-scooped-by-commonwealth.aspx" target="_blank">does not commute to work on the T</a>.  Yes, the T still is broke.</p>
<div id="attachment_630" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 276px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-630" title="No Cell Zone" src="http://www.transitboston.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/No-Cell-Zone-300x225.jpg" alt="No Cell Zone" width="266" height="200" /><p class="wp-caption-text">No Cell Zone</p></div>
<p>But none of those were the reasons that Governor Patrick and his appointees gave for the reasons they had lost faith in Grabauskas.  The breakdown occurred, they said, <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2009/07/three_mbta_boar.html" target="_blank">because two Green Line drivers in two years apparently had ignored traffic signals for different reasons</a>, and Grabauskas was not in Washington, D. C. when the NTSB released its report on one of the accidents.  And there was a power outage on the Green Line.  That&#8217;s it.  Never mind that Grabauskas nearly <em>overmanaged</em> the aftermath of the Government Center Green Line collision by banning cell phones from drivers.  And never mind that he was on an unpaid budget-related furlough at the time the NTSB report was released.  And never mind he is not the T electrician.</p>
<p>No matter; Grabauskas is out, but to Gov. Patrick&#8217;s likely chagrin, the former T general manager emerges from the tussle virtually unscathed.  That isn&#8217;t true for the Governor and his appointees.  The termination looks like short-term political retribution &#8212; at taxpayers&#8217; expense.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the real loser here looks to be the T.  The authority is leaderless at a critical time where the patchwork of agencies is being reexamined and when the modes of transportation finance are in flux in a way they have not been in memory.  The Governor has made noises time and again that he is a friend to transit.  Now he has an opportunity to go from words to action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.transitboston.com/2009/08/grabauskas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Line Is a Railroad and Other Urban Myths</title>
		<link>http://www.transitboston.com/2009/07/green-line-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.transitboston.com/2009/07/green-line-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bicycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aiden Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mishap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Railroad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transitboston.com/?p=555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Suffolk District attorney charged former Green Line conductor Aiden Quinn of gross negligence in the control of &#8220;a railroad train,&#8221; according to published reports.  Quinn was at the controls on May 8 in Government Center when his trolley struck another.  His trolley, not his train. The criminal charge apparently stems from a Massachusetts law [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Suffolk District attorney charged former Green Line conductor Aiden Quinn of <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/160-231.htm" target="_blank">gross negligence in the control of &#8220;a <em>railroad train</em></a>,&#8221; according to <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/07/21/trolley_operator_quinn_pleads_not_guilty_to_gross_negligence_charge/" target="_blank">published reports</a>.  Quinn was at the controls on May 8 in Government Center when his trolley struck another.  His <em>trolley</em>, not his train.</p>
<p>The criminal charge apparently stems from a Massachusetts law that applies to a &#8220;<a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/160-1.htm" target="_blank">railroad or railway of the class usually operated by steam power</a>.&#8221;  One probably can&#8217;t begrudge the District Attorney for not knowing the precise history of the Green Line and the Scollay Square trolley stop; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Line_(MBTA)" target="_blank">that history never involved steam</a>.</p>
<p>But it certainly would be interesting if the railroad law applied on the Green Line.  The law has some interesting, specific requirements.  A few things would need to change.  To be a trolley conductor, Quinn would have needed to <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/160-180.htm" target="_blank">serve as a &#8220;brakeman&#8221; for two years</a>.  Not a bad idea &#8230; except trolleys only have one driver (and a door-operator) and no brakeman.  Any trolley conductor who never worked as a &#8220;brakeman&#8221; (probably all of them) would be subject to a <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/160-183.htm" target="_blank">$500 fine and year imprisonment</a>.  (There&#8217;s no such thing as a railroad &#8220;operator&#8221;)  Bare-headed Green Line employees also would be no more; <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/160-177.htm" target="_blank">all railroad employees must don a &#8220;cap.&#8221;</a> An employee without a &#8220;cap&#8221; forfeits $45.</p>
<p>But on the other hand, maybe some changes would make some sense.  If the Green Line was a railroad <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/160-196.htm" target="_blank"><strong>then it would be required to accept bicycles</strong>, one per rider</a>.  Of course, as I&#8217;ve written previously, the <a href="http://www.transitboston.com/2008/08/bicycle-unfriendly/" target="_blank">Green Line irrationally prohibits bicycles under all circumstances</a>. And don&#8217;t try to hold the door to keep the Green Line train from leaving the station; <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/160-226.htm" target="_blank">if it&#8217;s a railroad that offense carries up to a $1,000 fine and 20 years in prison</a>, which makes what Quinn is facing look like tiddly-winks.</p>
<p>Obviously the Green Line isn&#8217;t run like a <em>railroad</em>.  There is a reason for that; it&#8217;s a <em>street railway</em>, apparently subject to <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/gl-161-toc.htm" target="_blank">an entirely different law</a>.  That law doesn&#8217;t require employees to wear caps, has no obvious requirements for the qualifications of conductors, and (unfortunately) doesn&#8217;t require that trolleys accommodate bicycles.  If you merely obstruct a trolley <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/161-94.htm" target="_blank">you only can be jailed for three months</a> (instead of 20 years).</p>
<p>And if you drive a trolley at excessive speed like Quinn allegedly did &#8212; even willfully &#8212; <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/161-84.htm" target="_blank">you forfeit $500</a>.  That might conceivably seem like a bit light of a maximum penalty.  But fear not; all operators of common carriers &#8212; from steamboats, to buses, to trolleys &#8212; also are subject to an entirely different law that the District Attorney apparently did not specifically name, which carries <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/265-30.htm" target="_blank">a penalty of two and a half years in jail for gross negligence in the control of<em> any</em> common carrier (not just a railroad)</a>.</p>
<p>What does all of this add up to?  Well, ultimately if the District Attorney succeeds in sending Quinn to prison for <em>three</em> years (instead of to jail for 2 1/2)  for crashing a<em> railroad train</em> (and not a <em>trolley</em>), then the T should get ready to welcome bicycles and their riders on that same line.  Because that&#8217;s the law!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.transitboston.com/2009/07/green-line-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
